Uh-Oh Kanada

Extraordinary as it sounds, two years into the Plandemic, the People’s Republic of Kanada is stuck in a seemingly endless lockdown and vortex of fear with the complicity of its own supine population. While the rest of the world moves on, the vast majority of that fragile country is cowering and cheering on their totalitarian Government to continue its anti-science crusade against its own people.

In an odd twist of the Stockholm syndrome, Kanadians are besotted with their own captors, having been convinced that they are unable to make their own decisions, while revealing the leftist compulsion to control other people.

The big news in this past week has been a literal case in point as to how neighbours can be absolute opposites. On the one hand, we see the one Party Nanny state behind the Ice Curtain in Kanada, with its reliance on decision by fiat with no accountability. On the other hand, the neighbour to the south shines with its messy, dynamic, litigious but beautiful example of a Government designed by a brilliant group of Enlightenment thinkers 250 years ago.

The Founders of the United States, in designing the Constitution with guaranteed rights and co-equal branches, understood human nature and foresaw the need to have checks and balances to avoid what we see in Kanada - an unchecked and unaccountable administrative state run by decree with nothing to stop it.

The case in point of course is the rulings by their respective Supreme Courts regarding the vaccine mandate issue. In each country, these mandates have not been legislated. They have been decreed much like what we see in China and Korea. In Kanada, nary a word of protest has been heard, with corporations and people gladly complying. Surprisingly, there was actually a case brought before the court to challenge the mandate.

Kanadians love to comply. Kanadians, driven by fear, want to be controlled.

The Supreme Court of Kanada, in my memory, has never overruled the Governments there. They are a rubber stamp group of political hacks with no interest in human rights, mostly owing to the fact that there is no Constitution with any teeth in that country. Anybody who cares to look at the pathetic document that Trudeau the 1st enshrined in 1982, will quickly see that the document is not worth the paper on which it is written. This is the history of the Kanadian judiciary, left to its own virtue signalling reliance on obeisance to the Government.

Hence their decision to green light the mandate which flies in the face of both Science and human rights.

In the United States, the Justices are constrained by a Constitution that has weathered remarkably well, owing to its Classical Liberal Enlightenment values of States rights, human rights, individual freedom and accountability through legislative checks.

Hence their decision to block the Biden mandate that would have affected more than 80,000,000 people. Common sense, science and human rights had their day in court and won. To read their reasons is to be relieved that there is a country that still has a connection to basic concepts of Governance.

I would pity the people in Kanada, but they deserve the Government they have chosen. As we know, many on the losing side of the American Revolution fled to Kanada, rejecting the very principles that have defined the divergence between the countries to date. Seen in this light, the present state of pusillanimity and authoritarianism in Kanada makes sense.

One would expect no more from a country founded by losers of a war and Mounted Police.

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-supreme-court-blocks-biden-vaccine-or-test-policy-large-businesses-2022-01-13/